Adyar

Livning freely and Dying peacefully 1

2013-11-04 21:25 #0 av: Aldebaran

Lecture by Radha Burnier, 2nd of August 2005, in Bristol, England. President of the Theosophical Society, Adyar. (Freely transcribed in Sweden from a recording.

Let us first take note of the fact that both birth and death are mysterious. Even so where we have no conscious control, nobody can say when he or she is going to be born, in which family and what race and so on. Nor can we take into our hands the time or the manner in which we shall die. It is because of this many people struggle in life and they are afraid of death. Because they do not know what it is all about. So it is very important to understand both life and death. Living and dying.

First of all perhaps we can ask ourselves the question, what do we mean by living? Does living merely consist of surviving, eating, reproducing, enjoying and dying? This is what all creatures do and most creatures do not belong to the human kingdom. Perhaps living by human beings means very much more than that. Yet there are confusions in our minds.

Let us imagine a person in a coma. He might be breathing. The heart may be pulsating. The brain may have some life in it. But the person is hardly living. And of course, one who has died is not alive. So being attached to a machine, which keeps the heart and the brain going, is obviously not living. Why? Because there is no experiencing. There is no contact with anything outside. An interchange. A person who is alive should normally be able to receive the innumerable impressions, messages, which come from outside. And also be able to communicate something to other forms of life, other human beings, communicate even with Nature, and so on. And this interchange is what we call relationship. So if there is no interchange, no relationship with anything, then, although as we said, the person’s heart may be beating and he lives a few years in the hospital, he is hardly alive. And all this can be summed up in the word awareness. When there is no awareness, when the consciousness is not conscious, it is not a state of living. And therefore perhaps we can go on to trying to understand how we are aware. In what depth, with what intensity, with what attention are we really aware.

Most of us are not aware of a vast number of things which we encounter in life. We may pass by a garden and in a moment of clarity we may be aware of the garden. We may be aware that we are passing through the garden. But not of its beauty. Even if we are aware of the beauty, it may be only a superficial awareness. Because our minds are not focused. The mind is absent. It is not fully present and part of it is wondering around, thinking about all kinds of things. Problems which perhaps have worried the person, planning what next to do, going over a misunderstanding with a friend or a family member, thinking of what shopping must be done during the day. All this can go on in the mind, while moving through a garden, or a street. So on the street you may meet a person, who you see with your eyes, but you don’t really see. This happens to all of us, that our awareness is fragmentary, superficial, not really intense. And if living consists in being aware, of being conscious, then the quality of that consciousness or awareness is of very great importance. And one thing that prevents that kind of consciousness from functioning is that we believe, we know, that if being in a coma, or a similar condition, is not really living, we then imagine, that being extremely active, finding excitements, satisfaction, in achieving things, in enjoyments, perhaps even in quarrels and problems, is living. If a person were given the option to be completely quiet or be in a situation where he has misunderstandings and problems and so on, I wonder how many people would choose being quiet. Because if there is not that search for enjoyment for activity and for achievement, it seems as if there is nothing in life to live for. A well known theosophical book Light on the Path says:”Kill out ambition.” It is the first curse. Almost all the people I have come across say, if there is no ambition, if there is no desire, then what is life about? What do we do? We must have at least a good desire, right sort of ambitions. But that ambition, that desire, that constant seeking of pleasure, excitement, all that gives images in the mind. They create a turmoil and therefore when passing through the street or through a garden or on many other situations the mind refuses to be quiet and to give attention. To be aware.

The awareness is then of a very limited kind. And if life is to be rich and full the awareness has to become much deeper, clearer, more intense. Activity prevents that. And therefore in spite of all activity there is frustration, there is loneliness, there is confusion, perplexity and so on. So to live fully means to give attention and to understand things which we do not even think about now. 

It was Matthew Arnold who said Do not let me die before I have begun to live. And we are all living. So was he. But learning to live truly, fully, is a different matter.

And if we want to learn how to give attention, to live a life of awareness, we must start in our everyday life. And there are people who have developed their consciousness so much that they are able to notice and to benefit from many things which we ignore totally.

I suppose you have heard of J. Krishnamurti who was widely known for his teachings. And he writes, and I quote: If you want to learn about a leaf, a leaf of the spring, or a leaf of the summer, you must really look at it. See the symmetry of it, the texture of it, the quality of the living leaf. There is beauty, there is vigour, and there is vitality in a single leaf. So to learn about the leaf, the flower, the cloud, the sunset, or a human being, you must look with all intensity.   

And probably if we observe ourselves we realize that we hardly begin to look at anything, a fellow human being, even a member of the family, yet alone a leaf or a cloud, before the attention turns to something else. At least to naming the experience, describing it, comparing it with yesterdays experience, or wishing there were a better one. So the mind runs away from fully looking at whatever it happens to encounter.

There is a well known Vietnamese Buddhist teacher whose books sell by the millions. He says: If you have this ability to look, when you look at a piece of paper, you will see not only the paper. You will see the tree, from which the paper came, and you will see the water, the earth, which nourishes that tree; you will see the cloud into which the water has transformed itself. You will see the rain falling upon the earth because the clouds shade it. So in the paper you will see the whole of life.

And this is not fancy, because the esoteric traditions, all of them, say that in the microcosm there is the whole of macrocosm. It is a holographic world, in which every atom contains the essential nature of the whole, of which it is a part. But it is not only seeing with attention a leaf, or a piece of paper, but watching many things in life.

Another beautiful passage can be found in the very well known book written by Thoreau, Walden. You know he retired into the woods and lived there absolutely alone, in New England, and he writes about that experience. In the beginning he says: To be alone was somewhat unpleasant but in a midst of gentle rain I was suddenly sensible of such a sweet and beneficial society in Nature, in the very pathway of the drops, and in every sight and sound around my house an infinite and unaccountable friendliness, all at once, like an atmosphere, sustaining me, has made the fancied advantages of human neighbourhood insignificant. And I have never thought of them since. Every little pine-needle expanded and swelled with sympathy and befriended me. I was so distinctively made aware of the presence of something kindred to me, that I thought no place could ever be strange to me again.

And that is something we miss, this feeling of kinship with our fellow human beings, with everything in Nature, even the pine needles and the drops of water, as there is a little drizzle, the animals around, the grass growing. They are all full of life. The vitality and vigour, as Krishnamurti says. And perhaps they are all speaking the language of Nature. In the same book Light on the Path it is said: ”Love itself has Speech.”

And there are many people who have heard the speech of things which we think are inanimate and which we think are not worth having relationship with. And they speak in their own language. In their own way.

   In the Koran, I believe, this is pointed out in its own special way.

There is a lot of feeling now about the Muslim being violent and dangerous and so on. But there is a wonderful tradition of knowledge among the Muslim people. The knowledge of the Sufis. And one of them writes: Not only man but all greats of being, the stone and the mineral, the plant and the animal have heard and understand the speech of God and praise Him according to their nature, mourn the separations from Him, and long to return to Him though we may be ignorant of their method of mourning and glorification.

So what is the heart of all that lives, of all the creatures, which are abound in the diversity of Nature? We are unaware of all that. We are unaware of the many the beauties at the invisible level.

Annie Besant, writing in her book the Ancient Wisdom, says that there are exquisite beauties, wonderful sounds, harmonies, everywhere around us, but our senses shut them out. And unless we are able to focus all our inner energy and focus it in whatever we are with, then perhaps we will not be able to know about the inner nature of things and if our mind becomes blunt then we become incapable of really feeling, seeing and knowing, even the obvious things. They say that the difference between the spiritually developed person and ordinary human beings is that the ordinary person is aware of the suffering, the loneliness, the struggle of others, only when it is directly before him. As we feel sympathy when someone close to us suffers. But there are millions of people who are suffering, who are struggling, who are bewildered and don’t know what life is about, who are afraid of death, and we can not feel their sorrow.

The life of the Buddha, perhaps some of you have read that wonderful book of Edwin Arnold, The Light of Asia, – incidentally I may say that Penguin is now publishing it and very large numbers of the book are being sold. In beautiful verse Edwin Arnold relates the life of the Buddha strictly according to how it is described in Buddhist tradition and the main part of his early life was the fact that he was kept in a kind of beautiful prison, a garden, palaces, lovely things, music, but he was not allowed to go outside that prison. But one day he demanded that he must be allowed to go. This was because a sage had prophesied that he would renounce the world or he would become an emperor and the king, his father, certainly did not want him to renounce the world and to give up his kingdom, and so he was afraid if this is so, what is happening in the world, he would give up his kingdom and all that he could enjoy. And then he was not yet the Buddha, the Prince, he saw an old man walking with difficulty, he saw somebody diseased, he saw a deed body being taken to the funeral and it stirred his heart so much that he decided that he will meditate until he obtained enlightenment and could understand why all this was happening and what the solution is. Now, this is not just a historical account. It is impossible to believe that this young man had never in his life seen somebody sick, among the many men and women who were part of relatives. Somebody must have fallen sick, some time or another.  But it is an allegory, a symbol of how we live enclosed in our own pleasant way of living. In our own particular thoughts. And then we know nothing about the world. We ignore the suffering everywhere. We ignore the fact that this suffering seems endless and so we don’t give attention to the question of how sorrow can be eliminated.

What is the purpose of life? Are we born only in order to suffer? To endure illness, die? Is that all life means, living means? Or does it mean beginning to question? Trying to find out what there is in life, which makes it really worthwhile. What is real and what is unreal. This is a very important question. And the mind begins to reflect. That is all part of awareness, of really living.

The human being who is unable to examine life, to question, why our lives are as they are, full of miseries, struggle, disappointment, frustrations, etc. is not really human. So there is a great deal which is meant by the word awareness. It makes us aware of Nature, beauty everywhere, the complexity, the creativity, which is all presented to us in a marvellous way.

We are unable also to be aware of the confusion we ourselves create. How we create problems for ourselves. Why there should be tension between us. Is there no solution to inequality, injustice and so on? If we are not thinking about these things, then our awareness is very limited and therefore we are not living fully. This is quite a large question, but I won’t go on with it.

But there is also the question of dying. What does death mean? Why are we afraid of death? Why are we reluctant to let go of this body?

Death is as natural as birth and death is a phenomenon which is extremely beneficial. I think this quotation is from Madame Blavatsky but I don’t remember from where exactly it comes. She writes that the organism lives because its parts are always dying. If the cells in our body where not constantly dying, our body could not survive. The life of the superior whole requires the death of the inferior. The death of the parts, depending on, and being subservient to it. This is all part of the process of life. And as life is death, so death is life and the whole great cycle of life forms but one existence.

There are cycles in life; minor cycles, major cycles. In our everyday life we find these cycles. And not only the seasons changing, the young becoming old, and the old giving place to the young, and so on. But all ordinary things in life. None of us can go on eating, however nutritious or delicious the food may be. You can only consume a certain amount and then you have to wait until that food has been assimilated and the essence of it absorbed into the body. So there is this cycle of eating and assimilating. A similar cycle is activity followed by rest and sleep. Again, nobody can go on being active endlessly. Soldiers are sometimes forced to march but a point comes when they can not march any more. They have to sleep because the body needs to rest and the brain needs to absorb to some extent what it can, the understanding of the experiences, which it has gone through. And that is a very important part of our sleep.

Krishnamurti says that the brain puts order into the events and experiences of the day. And that is also something which is part of Nature. 

Del 2

Satyat Nasti Paro Dharmah

Sajtvärd på Existens och Filosofi.

Anmäl
2013-11-04 21:29 #1 av: Aldebaran

"Tyvärr" gott folk så är detta på engelska. Ville inte ge mig på en översättning så att man riskerar andemeningen i texten.

Fortsättning följer i 2:a å sista delen.


Satyat Nasti Paro Dharmah

Sajtvärd på Existens och Filosofi.

Anmäl
2013-11-04 21:37 #2 av: Aldebaran

Passar väldigt bra att lägga ut denna artikel nu. Radha somnade in i Adyar (Indien) från sitt jordiska liv i torsdags, den 31:e Oktober, 90 år gammal.

Satyat Nasti Paro Dharmah

Sajtvärd på Existens och Filosofi.

Anmäl
2013-11-08 14:54 #3 av: rore


Denna har jag missat.

Många intressanta tanke vindlingar som texten tog mig med på och frågan Vad är liv och vad är att leva?

Väcktes upp inom mig.

Jag har alltid sagt att jag inte vill bli liggenade i någon sjukhussäng, fast vid uppehållande apparater. Där personal kommer och byter blöja och sätter sondmat. Tanken är förskräckligt avskräckande för mitt vakna jag.

Men när jag vårdar någon som är svårt sjuk, så behandlar jag alla lika, dvs som människor.

Oavsett vilken diagnos de har. Om de kan förmedla sig eller ej!

För jag kan för mitt liv inte tro på att de inte någonstans inom sig kan förnimma, känna/ veta vad som Är.

 Det är en tumregel. För vem/ vilken apparat kan med fullständig klarhet avgöra vad som är sant i detta?

Rädslan för att hamna som ett vårdpaket på någon inrättning har avtagit genom åren. För jag förstår att det är Det jordiska/logiska jaget inom mig som är helt enkelt skit rädd.

" Har bara läst halv vägs och återkommer nog med flera reflektioner. Har inte ens kommit halv vägs genom texten,, var bara tvungen att ventilera eftersom det väcktes någonting starkt inom mig"

 

Ödmjukheten drunknar i kampen över vem som har rätt och vem som har fel.

När slaget är över finns ingen vinnare.


I livets källa väntar svaren.Regnbåge Kedjor som tynger blir till länkar som bär.Hjärta

 

 


Anmäl
2013-11-12 21:32 #4 av: Moonwing

Att börja "se", betyder att man avstår en bit av sig själv, ger sig tid för eftertanke och även vågar möta sina egna (och andras) skapta tankeformer, det är gott och uppbyggande för själen och påskyndar vår andliga utveckling.

Olika erfarenheter i livet, tvingar oss att "se" saker tom egoistiska handlingar med verkningar, det är en process som vi är tvungna att gå igenom.

När vi möter tanken på döden och allt runt omkring, rannsakar vi inte endast bara "ämnet döden"-utan omprövar alla tankar runt just den biten av livet som sådan -både det kollektiva "uppfattningarna", vi skapat eller följt/följer och eventuellt nya mer klargörande, "högre" förståelser om vår tillvaro och om vad vi är och varför vi är här.

Just detta ämne (döden)-får ofta människor att börja tänka lite extra (själva)..just pga dess komplexitet. Döden som begrepp är ju verkligen mångfacetterad, i vilket sammanhang vi än pratar om den..

Detta tyckte jag var en sådan talande och enkel bild av en sak som ter sig så vardaglig för oss-men som manar till eftertanke.


"... She writes that the organism lives because its parts are always dying. If the cells in our body where not constantly dying, our body could not survive..."

".. Hon skriver att organismen lever eftersom dess delar är alltid dör . Om cellerna i vår kropp där inte ständigt döende , kunde vår kropp inte överleva ..."


Tack, Alde, en fin och tankeväckande text!

"Inom en människa av ljus, finns det ljus...När hon inte lyser, råder mörker."             (Evangelium enligt Thomas, 24)

  / Wingen Medarbetare på Existens o Filosofi

Anmäl

Bli medlem på iFokus

För att kunna delta i diskussionen måste du bli medlem på iFokus. Det går snabbt, enkelt, och kostar ingenting. Medlemskapet ger dig tillgång till över 300 sajter.